If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Law. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Law paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Law, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Law paper at affordable prices!
Legal vs. Ethical
Legal vs. Ethical
Is it right or wrong, ethical or not ethical, legal or illegal, these are questions often asked when searching for an answer to some of the world's most exhaustive debates. One particular situation that has received nationwide attention and remains the center of much conflict and heated controversy between law providers and citizens with different value systems is that of legalized abortion. The central argument in this debate hinges on the discussion of when life is considered to begin. Some believe that life begins at the moment of fertilization. While others believe that life doesn't begin until after the pregnancy or at the very least late in the pregnancy. Proponents for the Pro Life movement predominately use the Judeo Christian teachings found in the Holy Bible to support their argument. Followers of the pro-life movement believe that just because it is legal, it is still fundamentally immoral or unethical to take a human life. Those who are pro choice attempt to support their suppositions through science and the fact that abortion was made legal due to the decisions from landmark court cases the existence of legal precedent.
Prior to the 70's most state legislators widely criminalized abortion. Not until the controversial Roe vs. Wade case was the Supreme Court given the authority to decide if abortion is legal, therefore providing the judicial system with an opportunity to either fall within the shadow of former legislative "mood" or cross the line in favor of a new and potentially controversial attitude. . "In 17, in the landmark case of Roe vs. Wade, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provided a fundamental right for women to obtain abortions. The Supreme Court held that the right to privacy, established by the Court's precedents in the contraception cases of the 160's and early 70's, assured the freedom of a person to abort unless the state had a compelling interest in preventing the abortion. The Court then held that, though the state had an interest in protecting fetal life, this interest did not become compelling (i.e. adequate to allow banning an abortion) until fetal viability occurred in the third trimester of pregnancy. Thus, all the state abortion laws that regulated abortion during the first six months of pregnancy (except for the purpose of protecting maternal health during the second trimester) were invalidated" (Abortion Law Home page). Not long after Roe vs. Wade, two other cases broadened the Supreme Courts ability to govern abortion. The Abortion Law homepage states that, "with Webster in 18 and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1, the Supreme Court expanded this room, allowing the states that want to regulate abortion substantially more latitude to do so. Since 1, elective abortions can be banned after actual viability (c. 0- weeks), and pre-viability regulations only have to meet the new undue burden standard, meaning that a compelling state interest is not required so long as the law does not present a substantial obstacle to obtaining an abortion."
Contrary to that of the pro-choice belief system, there are the people, which choose life, otherwise known as pro-life. My own beliefs reside in this category. While the issue of abortion is legal, I personally think it is one of the most unethical decisions a person or persons could choose to make. Like many pro-lifers I believe that life begins before conception, quiet possibly before fertilization. These beliefs are evidenced by writings of the Holy word that guides my Judeo Christian beliefs. Jeremiah proclaimed the word of the LORD came to him and said, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart I appointed you as a prophet to the nations" (Jeremiah 1 5). The prophet Isaiah proclaimed to the nations that, " before I was born the Lord called me" (Isaiah 41). Isaiah also stated that the LORD says, "your Redeemer, who formed you in the womb" (Isaiah 444). The great psalmist David wrote, " For you created my inmost being you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be" (Psalm 1 1-16). According to the scripture Jeremiah's life begin prior to conception in the mind of God but Jeremiah's destiny is formed then and there, as was Creation itself, in God's mind and by God's command (Henderson, Charles). Henderson also notes that the scripture does not only doesn't support that life begins at conception, but even before fertilization. "In this account, conception does not even happen in the uterus; it happens in the secret place of God's own mind beyond this world of time and space. Again, the basic biblical teaching about the beginning of life is that it happens at God's initiative, by God's command, in God's mind. The Biblical writers did not even have the notion of conception that we have arrived at only recently through scientific investigation. They believed that the male sperm was the seed of life and that this seed is planted in the womb where it grows like any other seed. Clearly, in this, the biblical view, our notion of conception has no place. Human life no more begins at conception than the apple begins when an apple seed finds its way into the ground" (Henderson, Charles).
Therefore the idea that life begins at conception is unbiblical. Henderson notes that, "When someone argues that life begins at conception, and should be morally and legally protected from that point forward, they have no stronger legs to stand on than those who argue that life begins at birth." (Henderson, Charles) That belief aligns itself with the Humanistic perspective, because it places the initiative of human life in the parent's hands. In a sense it allows humans to "play GOD" if you will. It is my belief that giving humans this authority is not only unethical but also unjust. While the laws of our nation strictly forbid murder, sometimes punishable by death, it also clearly makes a procession for the murder of unborn babies. The validity of the cases themselves that made abortion legal is now under fire. Tom Newman reports that two women that were used as pawns by the ACLU are now doing something explosive trying to take their cases back to the Court to have them overturned. Newman reports that both women are now pro-lifers and are of the Christian faith. "Norma McCorvey, the Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade, and Sandra Cano, the Mary Doe of Doe v. Bolton, are now pro-life Christians. While McCorvey's case was about abortion, even though she lied to her lawyers, Cano's was not remotely associated with the gruesome procedure."
Reference
16. The Abortion Law Homepage. The Overview. Retrieved from http//members.aol.com/abtrbng/
17, Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. "Life Application Study Bible." Jeremiah (15)
17, Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. "Life Application Study Bible." Isaiah (444, 41)
17, Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. "Life Application Study Bible." Psalm (1 1-16)
Henderson, Charles. "When Does Life Begin." Retrieved from http//christianity.about.com/library/weekly/aa01400.htm
00, Newman, Tom. "Thirty Years of Lies." Focus on the Family. Retrieved from http//www.family.org/fofmag/sl/a00858.cfm
Please note that this sample paper on Law is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Law, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Law will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
