The Different Ideals of the American Dream

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Different Ideals of the American Dream. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Different Ideals of the American Dream paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Different Ideals of the American Dream, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Different Ideals of the American Dream paper at affordable prices with cheap custom writing service!

Journalistic accounts are typically thought of as factual account of what has happened. The accounts are mostly straight forward and easy to understand. They usually don't include the author's personal opinions or commentary. The boundaries for this were stretched and even broken by Hunter S. Thompson in, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and Joan Didion in, Slouching Towards Bethlehem. They both wrote their pieces from their own perspective and with commentary. The writings hold the writers own representation of a reality that they are trying to get the reader to buy into. The difference is that Thompson finds a way to deny objectivity through his writing, such as being high on drugs, but Didion is very objective and is caught making mistakes that go against her representation. Although the writing styles of these two journalists are similar, their messages are quite different. While Thompson embraces what he believes to be the American Dream, Didion implies that the American Dream is lost.

In, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, the prominent use of drugs is apparent, but the way Thompson uses these drugs in search of something, is not so clear. The subtitle of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is "A Savage Journey to the heart of the American Dream," this leads into Thompson's ideals of the American Dream which are found through his drug infested search. The use of drugs are used to change Thompson's perception. Thompson uses drugs as an accessory to everyday life in his account of events. These drugs cause the escape from reality to be possible which leads him to get in touch with a different perception. This perception that is gained helps Thompson find the ideals he is in search for along with the drugs being apart of the ideal. As Thompson and his lawyer are headed to Las Vegas he thinks to himself, after being frustrated by not knowing what the story he was covering was suppose to be, "Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels start closing in, the only real cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas" (Thompson 1). The fact that he complacently tells himself that this is a true escape from life goes to show that he is willing to take any means necessary to leave reality for a moment in time. Thompson uses the word "heinous" as though the chemicals have a life of their own that changes the way he perceives things. Thompson feels as though searching for the ideals of the American Dream lies within oneself. The way to find it depends on how deep you are willing to look for it. In the beginning of the event he says

But our trip was different. It was a classic affirmation of everything right and true and decent in the national character. It was a gross, physical salute to the fantastic possibilities of life in this country-but only for those with true grit. And we were chock full of that. (Thompson 18)

Although the first part of the quote about being, "right and true and decent in the national character," is ironic between what is legal in America and all of the drugs and alcohol he consumes, he leads the reader to believe that there are so many possibilities in America despite the irony in his writing style. Instead of saying that everyone can enjoy these possibilities he says that the only way to receive these possibilities is for you to have "true grit." He says this because of the illegal things, such as the drugs and the drinking, that they consume throughout the trip. He makes a point that not everyone is willing to risk themselves for these "fantastic possibilities." Because the risks that he takes are illegal it makes him paranoid throughout his writing. This paranoia is what causes tension between what he is embracing as the ideals of the American Dream. He embraces the ideals that it is okay for one to be pumped up on drugs and to explore the many "possibilities," or freedoms, which lay open to him. Towards the end of the piece Thompson illuminates this paranoia during his time in Circus-Circus when he's trying to leave with his attorney, "'Don't go near that elevator,' I said. 'That's jut what they want us to do…trap us in a steel box and take us down to the basement'" (Thompson 50). Through his entire search of all these possibilities, he is still concerned with getting caught and this causes a misrepresentation with what he's trying to sell to the reader. The ideals of having these possibilities are limited. One can't truly be entirely free to do things in America without consequences. During Thompson's time in Las Vegas he claims that he has found it, "'we came out here to find the American Dream, and now that we're right in the vortex you want to quit,' I grabbed his bicep and squeezed. 'You must realize,' I said, 'that we've found the main nerve'" (Thompson 47-8). Through all of his wild antics Thompson has claimed to find the American Dream and the ideals that go with it despite the fact that he has suffered from great paranoia. As Thompson goes through the actions to find his ideals of the American Dream he tends to encounter the law, not directly, but through this constant paranoia. Thompson is very un-objective in the way that he writes about his search for the American Dream. He doesn't claim to be telling the truth, but rather shows his perception in the state of mind he is in. While Thompson embraces the ideals of the American Dream, Didion represents a world that's "center was not holding" and which does not entail an American Dream.

Order College Papers on The Different Ideals of the American Dream

Joan Didion's journalistic account, Slouching Towards Bethlehem, is preceded by "The Second Coming," a poem by W.B. Yeats, where he writes of anarchy being "loosed upon the world," and that "things fall apart; the center cannot hold." The meaning of this poem differs for each reader, but he is speaking of the time when Jesus comes back to Earth. Didion uses his poem to start her representation of a society that is falling apart. She focuses on the "hippies" in San Francisco. She claims that they are devoid of any real meaning and that they are political un-realist who tends to adopt romantic idealism. At one point she talks to a man named Deadeye who is a "hippie" and does drugs but talks of his dreams in life, "'What I want to do now,' Deadeye says, 'is set up a house where a person of any age can come, spend a few days, talk over his problems…'"(Didion 5). Deadeye tells Didion of his aspirations which she ultimately dismisses by bringing up how he is going to make the money to buy the house. This leads back to the drugs he sells and her reinforcement that the generation that she is writing about is all about the romantic idealistic frame of mind. She leads you to believe that these "children" have no sense of an American Dream, yet her writing suggests otherwise; they do have goals to fulfill during their lives. Didion uses drugs as part of the downfall of how these generations, after her own, are functioning. Although drugs play a considerable role to Didion in the downfall, she blames her generation for not instilling this attribute of the ideals of the American Dream to the younger generations. She writes, "the signals between the generations are irrevocably jammed" (Didion 107). Meaning that somewhere between her generation and the generation she writes of, the communication was lost. She writes of this communication failure and the failure to stop believing

At some point between 145 and 167 we had somehow neglected to tell these children the rules of the game we happened to be playing. Maybe we had stopped believing in the rules ourselves, maybe we were having a failure of nerve about the game. Maybe there were just too few people around to do the telling. These were children who grew up cut loose from the web of cousins and great-aunts and family doctors and lifelong neighbors who had traditionally suggested and enforced the society's values (Didion 108).

Her generation has stopped "believing in the rules" and that the way to fix this "social hemorrhaging" was to start believing in the rules again and to teach these children just that. The game that they happened to be playing was the game of life. According to Didion they needed to set straight the rules for the children so that it could be passed on from them to their children, and so on. This completely takes away from the ideals of the American Dream, in which Thompson was embracing. Instead of having "possibilities" they are forced to follow rules or guidelines that are already set for them. For the ideals of the American Dream to be lost the children wouldn't be trying to set certain goals for what they want to do. The children are, "against the culture which had produced Saran-Wrap and the Vietnam War" (Didion 107). They feel as though the can make a difference by going against how the generations before them did things that produced ill effects and moving in a different direction to succeed in coming up with better results. Didion's representation of the counter-culture "hippies" of not having a dream, or an American Dream, is often times apparent, yet she omits it and looks past it to criticize the society she is living in.

Although Thompson and Didion write their accounts in the same era, the perspectives are very different. Thompson shows no objectivity in his writing, while Didion writes with a large amount of objectivity. She overlooks many aspects and excludes many things from her writing. She excludes the purpose of the "hippies," the awareness of social norms, and the analyses of what the "hippies" believe. The exclusion of these things is what is at stake in Didion's writing. She builds you to believe that through all of these children lies nothing more than a romantic idealistic sense of character towards the world. Thompson on the other hand shows us through his perceptions on drugs, that what he does are the ideals of the American Dream. This is something he believes to be true and which he embraces as something valuable to him. The search for the "possibilities" that are available to any one person and to not be afraid to do anything in search for them is his message. Thompson brings the stake of how far one person will go to find exactly what they are searching for. Between the two journalistic accounts Thompson appealed more in what he embraced and how he used his writing style to contribute to his representation. Although Didion made a distinct point of the "center not holding" she often dismissed things too quickly to allow the reader to buy into her representation.

Please note that this sample paper on The Different Ideals of the American Dream is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Different Ideals of the American Dream, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on The Different Ideals of the American Dream will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

The Crumbling

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Crumbling. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Crumbling paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Crumbling, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Crumbling paper at affordable prices with cheap custom writing service!

Winning three straight NBA Titles, the Los Angeles Lakers were again picked to finish of the league in the 00-00 season. But, not according to their plans, the Lakers had a dismal first half of the season, just barely reaching the .500 mark one game before the All-Star game. The Lakers, ranking 5th, bowed out to the top seeded and eventual NBA Champions, the San Antonio Spurs, during the second round of the playoffs. These undesirable causes prevented the Lakers from winning their fourth consecutive championship.

The first disappointment arrived at the Staples Center before the season even started. The Lakers' MVP center, Shaquille (Shaq) O'Neal, underwent foot surgery towards the end of August 00. This surgery meant that he would not be available for the start of the 00-0 season. This occurrence is dreadful as it is (the Lakers went 8-14 without him), but it also meant that Shaq would not be able to be on his feet for over three months. O'Neil weighed 50 pounds going into the surgery and was not able to run or exercise; therefore, he easily gained weight and got out of shape. On his return, he played 4 minutes out of the entire game and appeared to be physically exhausted. Shaq attempted to play himself into shape, but as the season went on it was apparent that this year was not going to be like the last three. He was not the only player to experience an injury this season. Almost every Laker player sat out time due to some kind of injury. During the season, these injuries were not too critical to the Lakers' affective ness, but in the playoffs, they were detrimental to their success. For example, Rick Fox, the starting small forward, tore a tendon in his left ankle in the first round of playoffs, ending his season. His injury was a heavy blow to the team because now a younger and less experienced athlete, Devon George, had to come in and start. George surprised most critics by performing almost to the same ability as Fox, but then injured his own ankle in game two of the Spurs series, causing him to sit out two games and crippling the Lakers even further than they already were.

The second factor which crumbled the dynasty was the role players lack of contribution to the team. The staggering statistic that supports this factor is the dramatic decrease in the three point average. Over the past three years, the Lakers team three point average had been over 5 percent in the regular season and 44 percent in the playoffs. This year, the Lakers shot a horrible 8 percent in the regular season and percent in the playoffs. They could have still survived all opponents even with this dismal statistic, but Los Angeles beat themselves by not rebounding. Through their previous streak, the Lakers led the league in offensive rebounding and were ranked third on the defensive glass as an average. Again, this field of statistics took a turn for the worse and Los Angeles ranked eighth on the offensive side and tenth on the defensive side. Anybody who knows anything about basketball knows that a team must rebound and have a variety of scorers to be successful. The Lakers also failed to accomplish this goal. The duo of Shaq and Kobe Bryant combined scored 66 percent of Los Angeless total points this season. Compared to the past three seasons, scoring only 56 percent of the total points, this statistic is a disgrace because this meant that the rest of the team was not helping the pair as they had in the past.

The final determinant of the crumbling Los Angeles Lakers was their poor defense. The most obvious cause of the poor defense was the sluggishness of 71 Shaq. Since ONeil did not have a productive off season, he became slower and slower and could not jump as well. This condition hurt the team because they had lead the league in blocked shots, two of the three championship years. As a result, more shots had a possibility of going in rather than not getting close to the rim at all. The NBA also obtained a new rule that allowed the use of a defensive zone. Not only did this rule allow opponents to prevent the Lakers from scoring as much, but the Lakers could not defend well while using the zone. Noticing their weakness, Los Angeles stuck with a man-to-man defense. This strategy created an unfair advantage for opponents. While the Lakers were becoming exhausted by constantly running to keep up with their man, other teams were able to take more of a break on defense with a zone. This sequence allowed opponents to save their energy to score more points or tire the Lakers to the point that they were unproductive offensively.

Order custom research paper on The Crumbling

In conclusion, the Los Angeles Lakers failed to obtain their fourth consecutive NBA title due to many causes. From many critical injuries to poor player productivity and a weakened defense, the Lakers were obviously not the team they had been the past three seasons. Even though there were many odds against them, the Lakers were still picked to be a successful team this year. So without a doubt, the 00-0 season was labeled a disappointment for the Lakers, but with extra effort and training, they can have a successful season next year.

Please note that this sample paper on The Crumbling is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Crumbling, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on The Crumbling will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

LORD OF THE FLIES.

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on LORD OF THE FLIES.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality LORD OF THE FLIES. paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in LORD OF THE FLIES., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your LORD OF THE FLIES. paper at affordable prices with cheap custom writing service!

A powerful scene in lord of the flies is the pig hunt. A group of young boys headed towards the sow with a row of piglet that slept, burrowed and squeaked. Wooden spears with fire hardened points flew towards the sow but she manages to escape with two spears sticking in her fat flank. For a moment they lose track of the sow, as it went crushing through the forest. Finally, they track her down again as it "staggers in an open space where bright flowers grew and the butterflies danced around each other and the air was hot and still". Jack stabbed the sow with his knife. "Found the throat and the hot blood spouted over his hands". He holds the head and jams the throat down on the pointed end of the stick. He speaks loudly. "This head is for the 'beast'. 'It's a gift'.

This scene helps to focus on one of the major themes of the novel which is the "loss of innocence'. The boys were once innocent 'littuns' but now they were becoming more like savages. The boys once used to go to school but now they hunt. They were becoming very brutal and violence was becoming a regular occurrence. "As the sow staggers in an open space" represents innocence, innocence that the boys did not understand. The author, William Golding implies that the 'loss of innocence' has little to do with age but relies on person's understanding of human nature.

The scene also focuses on another aspect, which is 'superstition.' the sow's head is presented to the 'beast' as a gift. It is presented to the 'beast', which does not even exist. "The lord of the flies" is seen as one of the manifestation of devil. The boys also the decaying corpse of the parachutist as the 'beast'. As in the text it reads. " First you know now, we've seen the beast" this reflects the fact that they had evil within them. Their (Jack, Maurice, Roger, Robert, Bill, and Henry) savagery is completed by primitive religious sacrifice, an attempt at propitiation.

Furthermore, another vital point about the scene is the 'settings'. The scene takes place in "an open space where bright flowers grew and the butterflies dances around each other" which represents 'heaven'. A heaven where innocents sow was sacrificed to reinforce to their superstitious thoughts. There was no reason to sacrifice a sow, which did not even harm them. It was simply a destruction of natural, environment. A death of the sow in an 'heavenly' setting represents the breakdown of humanity.

Help with essay on LORD OF THE FLIES.

In conclusion, I would say that the scene has a great impact on novel. It shows violence, brutality, worship to the 'beast', breakdown of law and order and the most importantly the change from innocence to 'savagery'. The question which keeps ringing in our minds is the "would the boys had survived, if they did not become savages?"

Please note that this sample paper on LORD OF THE FLIES. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on LORD OF THE FLIES., we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on LORD OF THE FLIES. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Much Ado About Nothing

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Much Ado About Nothing. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Much Ado About Nothing paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Much Ado About Nothing, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Much Ado About Nothing paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!

The play "Much Ado About Nothing" is one of William Shakespeare's mature comedies. It is a light-hearted story that captures the imagination of its audience through the use of language, particularly that of wit. It concerns itself most importantly with the notion of love and relationships, especially marriage in Elizabethan society. There are many other social and personal conflicts between the various characters that will be discussed, including the view of illegitimacy during those times, the patriarchal society, as well as the personal faults of certain characters that play a part in the misunderstandings and confusion of circumstances in the play. Rather than resolving these conflicts with the ending, they are rather forgotten about and put aside, only to presumably resurface at a later stage. The play tries to end by tying up the loose ends of the various plots and give the false impression of the characters living 'happily ever after'. It is for this reason that Much Ado About Nothing does not succeed, in my opinion, in its comic ending.

There were many social discrepancies during the time in which "Much Ado About Nothing" was written. Illegitimacy was a one of them. Illegitimate children or 'bastards' were looked down upon by society to a certain extent. They were seen as symbols of the inconstancy of women, a fate that their mother had brought upon them. Don John is Don Pedro's (the king's) bastard half brother, a fact mentioned in a derogatory way throughout the play. Benedick describes him as " John the Bastard" (act4 sc1 ln18) when he suspects Don John of mischief in the matter of Hero's chastity, an altogether not very complimentary title.

Beatrice too is a fatherless daughter, someone wild and uncontrollable who can think for herself and make her own decisions, as she has no father to obey and to answer to. In both of these cases, the two characters are presented as somewhat deviating from the norms of that society Don John is a self confessed "plain-dealing villain" (act1 sc ln1), who meddles in others affairs for no inherent personal gain, and Beatrice is a non-conforming woman, totally free spirited and strong-willed in all aspects, particularly against the institution of marriage.

Love is represented in its many facets, that of its strengths and weaknesses, it's humiliations, contradictions, and, ultimately, its supposed triumphs.

Cheap Custom Essays on Much Ado About Nothing

Hero and Claudio have a physical love based on appearance. The whole marriage depends not on Hero, but on Leonato her father. Love is presented here as more of a business deal, a means of financial security as Claudio makes sure that Hero is Leonato's only heir " Hath Leonato a son, my lord?" (act1 sc1 ln 10) asks Claudio to Don Pedro. It is clear that he has an eye on his future wealth and that his concern is his social position. Hero and Claudio play the love game by the rules set up by society at that time. Hero is constantly obeying her father in view of marriage as was seen in that patriarchal society, as Antonio says of her " Well niece, I trust you will be ruled by your father." (act sc1 ln 7) and Beatrice mockingly remarks "Yes, faith; it is my cousin's duty to make curtsy and say, 'Father, as it please you.'" (act1 sc1 ln 8) Women in those days were controlled, to some extent, by their fathers (or husbands), as their virtue was highly valued to find a suitable match, thereby needing to be protected. Claudio asks her father's permission to marry her and enlists the help of his friends to win Hero for himself. How can Hero possibly truly love Claudio, as she is being forced into this marriage by the conventions of the day and by what her father considers a profitable match? How can Claudio truly love Hero when he has only known her for such a short while and seems more concerned with the amount of money that she has, than anything else? Their love seems to be an arranged and profitable business deal, with Claudio being more in love with the image that he perceives Hero to be, rather than with the actual person herself.

There is also a disruption of the natural course of love within the play by a villainous Don John. When Don John accuses Hero of being unfaithful, Claudio fails to jump to her defence. Instead he says "If I see anything tonight why I should not marry her tomorrow, in the congregation where I should wed, there will I shame her." (act sc ln88) stupidly believing Don John again, after he has already caused trouble. This presents a monstrous side to Claudio's personality. He is not content to just cancel the wedding, he feels it necessary to shame Hero at her own wedding. The reader gets the uneasy feeling that Claudio is wholly unworthy of the sweet, innocent and passive Hero.

Beatrice and Benedick have a more intellectual 'love'. Their antagonism grows into romance, but a romance that has been set up with lies told by other characters, to dupe the two of them into falling in love. This matchmaking of Beatrice and Benedick that defies the notions of the 'love at first sight' romantic idealism that is prevalent throughout the relationship of Hero and Claudio.

The love between Beatrice and Benedick is based on shaky foundations and so cannot be true affection. The fact that both of them are so against the idea of marriage at the beginning of "Much Ado About Nothing" is another cause for concern. Both of them swear that they will never marry Beatrice when she says " I had rather hear my dog bark at a crow than a man swear he loves me" (act1 sc1 ln5) and the way she describes marriage as a dance that is lively, then serious then starts to decay with sorrow (act sc1 ln48), insinuating that marriage is negative, sad and brief in its happiness. Benedick too says " I will live a bachelor" (act1 sc1 ln17) and that "I love none" (act1 sc1 ln0). Beatrice and Benedick both have a more cynical, practical view of love. They supposedly choose not to play the traditionalist game of love (of wooing), although unconsciously they are enlisting in the help of Don Pedro, Leonato and Hero, amongst others, who chart the course of their romance through trickery.

Beatrice knows her place in this patriarchal society. She realises that she is seen as disagreeable as it has been pointed out to her many times by Leonato who says " thou wilt never get thee a husband if thou be so shrewd of thy tongue" (act sc1 ln15) implying that she is an uncontrollable woman who talks too much and by Benedick who refers to her earlier in the play as " Lady Disdain" (act1 sc1 ln 85) implying that she is both scornful and contemptuous. Rather than challenge her place in this male-dominated society, Beatrice realises that she cannot go against Claudio, a man, in defending Hero's honour with her wit and so uses Benedick's love for her as an excuse to get him to "Kill Claudio" (act4 sc1 ln 76). The fact that Benedick is willing to kill his friend for a woman does prove that Beatrice does yield some power over a man and shows us that women weren't totally dominated by men during those times. She uses his love unfairly as a means to gain her own revenge.

At the end of the play there are many attempted resolutions of the discord between the characters and rifts in the plot so that an overall feeling of harmony and contentment is produced. On the surface Claudio and Hero are happily married, as are Beatrice and Benedick, a double marriage that reinforces the idea of everlasting happiness. Don John has been arrested for his mischievous plots to mar the marriages and everyone is content and in good spirits.

On closer inspection we notice the holes in this ending. Firstly the blame for all this unhappiness and potential disaster is placed squarely on Don John's shoulders. It is acceptable for the characters to presume this, as he is an illegitimate son and so it is up to standard in thinking that he would be at fault (as their opinion surrounding his birth is already not very high.). Yes Don John may have planted the seeds of destruction, but it is through the faults of the characters, particularly Claudio's eavesdropping on Don John, his gullibility in believing Don John again that Hero is unchaste, and his jealous insecurities and lack of trust for Hero that contribute greatly to the misunderstandings.

Secondly, Hero, unrealistically forgives Claudio immediately for slandering her at her own wedding, by instantly marrying him. We greet this marriage scene with protest, not acclaim as there is strong evidence that Hero has been unjustly treated by the person who supposedly loves her. She is once again subservient to the males in her life, nothing more than a product of the society in which she lives.

Thirdly, Beatrice and Benedick, now married, have both become hypocrites, first swearing off the idea of love and now succumbing to a love that is not their own, but a product of their imagination, brought about by other people's deception. Even though they profess to be in love, there are signs that it won't end happily. They still fight with each other, both hoping to get the last word. Beatrice tries to win the argument by saying "...I yield upon great persuasion, and partly to save your life, for I was told you were in a consumption" (act5 sc4 ln5), when she speaks of agreeing to marry Benedick. It is Benedick, however that gets the last word. He says "Peace! I will stop your mouth" (act5 sc4 ln 7) as he kisses her, silencing her from voicing her own opinion. The reader gets the uneasy feeling that they will be at each other's throats again before long.

It is interesting to note that at the end of the play, both of the characters considered most unacceptable according to that society (by having no father) are the only ones who have conformed or been controlled Don John by the institution of the law and Beatrice by the institution of marriage. To consider the idea of marriage in the same context as that of a prison is to paint the bleakest of pictures about Beatrice's future happiness.

Interestingly enough, the play ends with a dance, something jovial and celebratory that falls in line with the concept of a happy ending. However, underlying this merry dancing is the idea of strict order. The dances of those days had very particular, restricted movements into which the dancers had to comply in order to be able to take part. This is symbolic of the fact that there is no place in this society for those, such as Beatrice unless they conform to the 'steps of the social dance'. At the end of 'Much Ado About Nothing', circumstances and feelings are forgotten about and cast aside for the moment instead of being resolved. In any situation, these unresolved conflicts are bound to resurface later and cause greater anxiety and insecurities between the characters marriages, challenging the fairytale reassurance that "alls well that ends well".

Please note that this sample paper on Much Ado About Nothing is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Much Ado About Nothing, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Much Ado About Nothing will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Killing a bird on a cold day

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on killing a bird on a cold day. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality killing a bird on a cold day paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in killing a bird on a cold day, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your killing a bird on a cold day paper at affordable prices!

When you save a photo, what file format should you use? If you plan to print the photo or reopen it later in PhotoDeluxe Home Edition, you can use any format (for a photo with no layers) or Home Edition or Photoshop format (to preserve layers). But if you want to use your photo in a different application, other file formats can make this task easier.

How do you want to use your photo?

• Display it on the World Wide Web

Write your killing a bird on a cold day research paper

• Send it through e-mail

• Use it as your screen saver

• Use it as your Windows wallpaper

• Use it in a publishing application like Adobe PageMaker® or Adobe FrameMaker®

• Open it in Adobe Photoshop

• Open it in a previous version of PhotoDeluxe

• Open it in Microsoft Paint

• Open it in a Macintosh application

• Use it in a word processing application like Microsoft Word®

• Use it in a presentation application like Microsoft PowerPoint®

See also

Saving in Adobe Acrobat format

Saving in Adobe Photoshop format

Saving in BMP format

Saving in GIF format

Saving in EPS format

Saving in FlashPix format

Saving in JPEG format

Saving in PICT format

Saving in PNG format

Saving in TIFF format

Using a photo with Microsoft OLE

Saving a file in a previous version of PhotoDeluxethe Layers palette, the Object-order menu at the top of the photo window, or the Select menu (if you are using advanced menus).

To rearrange the stacking order of text blocks, you must use the first method below.

To rearrange the order of layers or text blocks using the Object-order menu

1 Select the Object Selection Tool as explained in Choosing a selection tool.

To select a layer, click an object in the photo that is on the layer you want to move. To select a text block, click inside the text.

Do one of the following

• Click the Object-order menu at the top of the photo window.

• With advanced menus displayed, click the Select menu. For more information, see Using advanced menus.

4 Choose the direction you want the layer to move

• Send To Back moves the layer to the bottom of the stack.

• Send Back One moves the layer down one layer.

• Bring Forward One moves the layer up one layer.

• Bring To Front moves the layer to the top of the stack.

Note These commands work on text only if you have multiple text blocks on the Text layer. You can rearrange the stacking order of text blocks in relation to one another, but all text remains in the Text layer, on top of all other layers.

To rearrange the order of layers using the Layers palette

1 To view the Layers palette, with advanced menus displayed, choose View Show Layers. For more information, see Using menus and Using advanced menus.

In the Layers palette, drag the layer that you want to move up or down in the Layers area.

Please note that this sample paper on killing a bird on a cold day is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on killing a bird on a cold day, we are here to assist you. Your essay on killing a bird on a cold day will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!

Augustine died in 40 at the age of 76 (or 780). When he died there were barbarians at the gate of Hippo. This all started when Alaric, king of the Goths, took Rome in 410. With this corruption, Roman society was thrown into confusion. In the west there is a vacuum of authority, so the church steps into the vacuum. They seized political control. The barbarians didn't care, they were not anti-Christian. Actually, Alaric considered himself an Arian Christian. Chalcedon happens after all of this. This goes on for centuries where political authority and the church were intermingled. These years prevented the spread of Islam through Europe. It spread quickly through Northern Africa by force of arms. The Christian political system did a lot to stop that. This also accomplished some form of stability.

Pope Gregory supervises the rebuilding of the ruins of Rome.

During this time, France is Christian in the same way Morocco was Islamic, the government said they had to be. This was a shallow political Christianity. The movement that comes out of this is monasticism. Western monasticism is different than the eastern. Benedict is the one that catalogued western monasticism. Western monasticism is almost all communal and it is not about punishing the body (sitting on poles). Western monasticism forces the evangelical counsel of obedience, not to God, but to the abbot of your monastery. Permanence became true, if you commit to a monastery, you are there forever.

St. Francis of Assisi - His name was Giovanni, but his father called him Francesco because he like France. From a filthy rich family and he loved money. Had lots of $ and spent a lot of it. Decided to embark on a military career, he wasn't good. Got captured and was a P.O.W. for about a year. When he was released, he was going to go back into the military but then had a vision that told him to go home. He gets home and he is not the same guy. All kinds of stories about him began to circulate. His friends thought that he was in love, so they asked him and he said yes, he is getting married to Lady Poverty. His family is not too happy about that. One day he was crossing a field on his horse and he meets a leper, he embraces the leper and gives him all of his money. He made a pilgrimage to Rome and was watching people give their offering at the a cathedral and he was not happy about what the people were giving, so he gives all of his money in the offering. Then he sees a poor person and gives him all of his clothes and he takes the beggars clothes. Dad is really really mad. He goes into his dad's shop and takes his cloth and sells it to give away the money. His dad takes him to court over it and Francis said that he only had one father and that was God. H4 stripped all his clothing off, left them in court and walks out of the court, then he is attacked by robbers. He ended up in a monastery that took care of him, nursed him back to health. He takes principals of poverty and uses text in Matthew, give everything, take nothing, take a staff only...etc. Francis adopts this literally, takes one sandals, one tunic, and a staff. He starts the Franciscan order. He is not an administrator. Franciscan are still around today. By the rules, they have no property, their monasteries are really nice though. In 11, I think, they were given a chapel in Assisi. Francis preached to everything, even birds. His followers gained immense following. A women's form of this movement came about called the Poor Clares. In 11 the Franciscans were given a retreat center called La Verna. In 14 Francis retired to La Verna. He fasted for 40 days, and during that time he meditated on the suffering of Christ. He experienced the Stigmata. St. Francis supposedly had all five of the wounds of Christ.

Do my essay on People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today CHEAP !

St. Dominic - came from a devout Catholic family, his mom was actually a saint. His oldest brother gives all he has to the poor, lives in hospitals, etc. Placed a lot o value on education, was generous but didn't give everything away. In 10 he met a group in France called the Albigensians. They would say they were Christians. They looked like Catholics, but didn't have a lot of use for the popes, therefore, the church didn't really like them. Dominic didn't think that the church was prepared to deal with the albigensians. So he wanted a bunch of people to study scripture all the time so that people would be more ready to defend these heretics. The pope was all for that, so he got some followers and established the Order of Preachers and the pope approved it quickly. Dominic became the pope's #1 theologian. Even to this day, the pope's theologian is a Dominican.

Sr. Robert - He was an abbot in a monastery in France. He was troubled by relaxed way that the monks were taking the Benedictine rule, so he got a bunch of people and went to Citeaux. This was before St. Francis. In 108, on March 1st, on the Feast of Saint Benedict, this new order began to restore the order of St. Benedict. Movement that came out of this was the Cistercian movement, named after the city. They are very focused on manual labor. During this time, there was a lot of theological discussion, especially on predestination. One of the famous debates was between Hincmar and Gottschalk. Gottschalk was an avid reader of Augustine, he said Augustine was right about everything, he said that God predestined some people for heaven and some to hell and you can't do anything about it. Hincmar said no, that's not true, that takes away all will, he said no, that would make us puppets. Both claimed to be interpreting Augustine though, Gottschalk is much closer to what he was actually saying. They also had debates about the eucharist - transubstantiation. During this time, the monks were copying scripture. These people are the reasons that we have the writings of Augustine.

10 - papacy reached a new low. The church is becoming more French and the kings of France have become very influential, they could actually dictate to the pope some of the actions he would do. This would be easier if the pope were in France, so they moved the papacy to Avignon, France. The papacy was in Avignon for 68 years, was called the Babylonian Captivity of the Church. In 178 a new pope was chosen, he was Italian, his name was Urban VI. Urban is serious about being the pope. One of the first things that he says is that the church should not be a place to go and get rich - The cardinals were rich and the commoners were in poverty and that was not right. Simony existed (Simony is giving positions to your friends) but Urban said this needed to end. He also wanted to cease the ties to the government. The college of cardinals is absolutely appalled so they met again and voted again and elected a new pope from France, he is Clement VII. Urban wasn't going anywhere so now there were two popes. This continued for thirty years. Clement lived in Avignon. In 14 Nicholas of Clemanges said he saw three ways to solve the two pope problem. First, the way of concession - both popes would agree to step down. Second, the way of compromise - both popes should get together and choose a mutually accepted third party would decide how to solve the problem. And third, the way of the council - they historically can only meet if the pope calls a council, but he says it may be the only way for them to meet without the pope's approval and whatever they decide is law. In 140 the church finally went the way of the council. They got cardinals from the two sides to meet, not the popes. They met in Piza, Italy (leaning tower city). Both sides decided that neither one of the popes could be legitimate so they deposed both and elected Alexander V, the other two wouldn't step down, so now there are three popes. In 1415 they tried again at the Council of Constance. They issued a statement called the Sactrosancta. This statement becomes the way that they can theologically stantiate what they are about to do. In 1415 Urban, Clement, and Alexander were no longer alive, so Gregory XII, Benedict XIII, and John XXIII were the popes. At the Council of Constance, they deposed John. Gregory agreed to step down. Benedict was not going gracefully so they got rid of him anyways. Then they elected a new pope - Martin V. No one challenges Martin V.

John Wycliffe emerges at this time. He was born in 10 - during the Babylonian captivity of the church. He is Catholic. An Englishman, has a doctorate of divinity from Oxford. We know him because he wrote stuff the church didn't like. He wrote Uncivil Dominion. He said that there was a difference between the idea of the church and the actual physical church. He said if 00 people are in the church, there may not be 00 that are the church, maybe it is only 40, and the pope may not be one of them. He believed very much so in predestination. He said that since we cannot know who the invisible true church is that there is no reason to consult the pope or the college of cardinals, he says just read scripture. The pope doesn't like him, calls him a heretic. Wycliffe said if the church hierarchy wanted to prove there holiness, then they should give away all of their possessions and live in prayer and preaching. He also wrote On th Eucharist about transubstantiation. Thomas Equinos said that the eucharist (the substance) becomes the body and blood of Jesus but that the form of the bread and wine doesn't change (the accidents) and that's why it still looks the same. Wycliffe is a philosopher and he said that God would not ruin substance and that accidents and substance are not separate so this is not possible. He believed that the change in the eucharist was not physical, it was spiritually (consubstantiation). Wycliffe died in 184 a natural death. At the council of constance the council wanted to kill Wycliffe but he was already dead, so they dug up his bones and burned them.

In 147 John Hus was born. Hus got a degree from the University of Prague (Czechleslovakia). Wcliffe's books were on the campus and he reads them. He becomes outspoken and then get excommunicated in 1411. This did not shut him up, he continued to complain, so he was excommunicated him again in 141. In 1415 he was invited to the council of constance to explain his views. He says, no you will kill me. But they say, no we won't hurt you so he goes. But as soon as he gets there they put him in jail and then burn him at the stake. Hus's associate, Jerome of Prague, was also killed at this time. Hus was a national hero at this time though.

Please note that this sample paper on People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on People fromt the Western World that Shaped Christianity Today will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Sinificant experience

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Sinificant experience. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Sinificant experience paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Sinificant experience, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Sinificant experience paper at affordable prices!

Significant Experience

Ten seconds is a short period of time that changed my life. July 1, 00 two days after my birthday. As I was sitting in my at my house watching television my little brother rushed in the house. He told me that some boys were throwing rock at him while he riding his four-wheeler. So I jumped on the A.T.V. and rushed down the road where the boys were. I thought I was playing the big brother role by going to take care of everything. As I turned the curve ready to confront the boys I lost control. The machine tossed and tumbled with me still attached. You could feel the impact of the four-wheeler as it struck the ground on top of me. It all felt like a dream. Little did I know this would be a dream not so easy to wake up from. I got up very delirious I wasn't sure which was up or down. I heard the of one young lady echo look at his ear. There was no time to wait for the ambulance. Luckily a friend of the family was riding by and saw me and took me to Richmond Memorial Hospital. I look in the man's mirror at my mangled ear as blood dripped to my shirt. The loss of blood made me blank out a couple of times on the way to the hospital. I was rushed in quickly and placed in emergency room. While I was in the bed the only person I wanted to see was my mother to tell me everything would be all right. When they wheeled me through the lobby, and I saw my family members it felt like my head filled up with water. I started to cry for no reason. I was transported to Moore County Hospital. There I had to have plastic surgery. Throughout the operation the doctor had to pick and dig rocks and gravel out of my ear. The operation took around three hour to surgically repair my ear before I left that night they had to clean my back where it had scraped the road. I remember the nurse saying that the people at the other hospital did not do a good job at cleaning my wounds. I went home that night. The next morning I got up and went to the site of my accident. You could still se the spot where the blood dripped from my ear to the ground. While I was trying to recover there were always limit to what I could do. When I would try to stand sometimes I fall right back down. Me being the person that I am I would never lie down for anything, and I wasn't about to start now. After all the trials and tribulations I was still able to play my final year on the Richmond Senior High's football team. The support received from my family, friends, and coaches continues this to be a significant experience in my life. I was very lucky to be able to live my life normal. I also realize that life is short and can be taken from you in matter of seconds. The only thing to do is to live life to the fullest. My accident has shown me that I've been through a lot of things, and for me to live life while it is here.

Please note that this sample paper on Sinificant experience is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Sinificant experience, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Sinificant experience will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!