If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on War in Iraq. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality War in Iraq paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in War in Iraq, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your War in Iraq paper at affordable prices!
WAR IN IRAQ
Events have moved us into war with Iraq. Iraq needed to disarm and Saddam Hussein needed to be removed from power to have avoided the war. The period from the end of the first Gulf War in 11 to the beginning of the second Gulf war in 00 saw continuous military pressure on Iraq by the United States and the United Kingdom. The US-UK launched major air strikes against Iraq on several occasions, as well as deploying threatening forces in Iraqs proximity and operating military air patrols to enforce no-fly zones. In early 00, the Bush administration announced that it considered Iraq to be part of an axis of evil and threats of a US-led war for regime change got steadily louder throughout the spring and summer. By September, it had become clear that Washington was planning a full-scale invasion, as it won authorization for military action from the US Congress. President Bush had said that the U.S. would unleash war against Iraq unless Saddam Hussein fled his country within 48 hours. Theres only one thing Saddam Hussein could have done to avoid U.S.-led military action against Iraq and that was full disarmament. The U.S. troops were ready for war long before the war started. Bush set a course for war without backing after months of trying to persuade Saddam to disarm and that said that Saddam could not retain power even by beginning to disarm his nation of weapons of mass destruction. A war with Iraq will cost us a lot of lives, military and civilians. War and terrorism can and will touch any of us in a variety of ways, personally and geo-politically. Iraq's response to the demand that the missiles be destroyed was the benchmark test of Iraqi cooperation during a crucial showdown at the UN Security Council. Saddams game plan had been to do the minimum necessary to avoid a war he cant win. That means destroying the missiles, in the hope that it would have put UN authorization for war beyond President Bushs reach.
The U.S. has been patient, tried sanctions and gave Iraq a resolution for time to disarm. Saddam Hussein has defied all efforts (Paneth 1). Saddam has a history of hating Americans and has ties to terrorists and is a destabilizing force in the Middle East. After twelve years of diplomacy and weapons inspections our good faith has not been returned. The Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage. About 100 US Special Forces members and more than 50 Central Intelligence Agency officers have been operating in small groups inside Iraq for at least four months, searching for Scud missile launchers, monitoring oil fields, marking minefield sites, and using lasers to help US pilots bomb Iraqi air-defense systems. The operations, which also have included small numbers of Jordanian, British, and Australian commandos, are considered by many analysts to be part of the opening phase of a war against Iraq, even though the Bush administration has agreed to a schedule of UN weapons inspections
Citizens long to see evidence that our leaders are working intelligently and diligently for peace than for war. Even as forces were mobilized President Bush stated that avoidance of war was foremost and that Saddam must willfully disarm or be exiled (Loven ). This is a serious time to reflect deeply on our responsibility as citizens who stand for peace, human rights and democracy. The U.S. will provide security against those who spread chaos, settle scores or threaten Iraq. Destroying weapons of mass destruction will be lead by the U.S. (Holland 1). War with Iraq could cost us nearly 5 billion dollars. A shorter war would mean less spending, but the costs could be higher if Iraq uses chemical or biological weapons on U.S. troops, or if it sets fire to oil fields as it did in Kuwait in the Gulf War.
Custom writing service can write essays on War in Iraq
The U.S., Britain, and Spain propose that Iraq had missed its last chance to disarm. The Australian government agreed to commit troops to military action against Iraq. Germany, France, China, and Russia called for full and effective disarmament through peaceful means (Security ). These governments share our assessment of the danger, but not our resolve to meet it. The war could throw the Islamic world into turmoil and a crisis of this kind should be solved by exclusively peaceful means. China, France and Russia would have used their veto power to block the war resolution if there had been a vote. They believe the inspectors need more time. Canada had said that if military action was launched without a new resolution they would not participate. Turkey's parliament rejected a measure that would have let the U.S. base 6,000 troops in Turkey so the troops could move against Iraq from the north. South African disarmament experts are convinced Iraq is disarming and that Iraq needs more time (Mroue ). The Egyptians say Iraq is fully responsible for the current crisis in the Middle East. For the past six years, PNAC has lobbied former President Clinton and Bush heavily to initiate a war in Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power, claiming the country posed a serious threat to the U.S. and its allies because of its ability to develop weapons of mass destruction.
"The U.N. weapons inspectors are saying that Baghdad is cooperating with inspections and that some documents presented to them as evidence were forged". Hans Blix states that the Iraqi government is complying with inspections of weapons of mass destruction program" (Kole 1). According to the Iraq Journal the Al-Nassr Compound that was claimed to be a factory of weapons of mass destruction was disputed by Prime Minister Amin to be "blatant fabrications"(Scahill 1). Iraq invited anyone who wanted to come to inspect the Al-Nassr Compound to verify Iraq was in line with U.N. disarmament resolutions (Scahill ).The Iraqi government was withholding information on weapons of mass destruction and the Iraqi government was thumbing their nose at U.N. weapons inspectors and not being forthcoming and this in turn was a threat to world peace (Paneth ). The Iraqi regime has repeatedly defied the will of the international community since the end of the Persian Gulf War twelve years ago by violating numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions demanding that it give up its weapons of mass destruction. Iraq has been accused of financing suicide bombers and terrorist (Fournier ). Using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country or any other country. Iraq violated a U.N. resolution by moving a missile system within range of troops in Kuwait. U.S. Central Command targeted a mobile surface-to-surface missile system located near Basra, about 45 miles southeast of Baghdad. The Iraqi military has moved several dozen heavy transport trucks north of Baghdad, signaling the possible movement of an Iraqi heavy armored division. Some believe that Iraq is unlikely to use chemical or biological weapons to defend itself because world opinion would turn against it. The Iraqi government has also been highly suspicious of the UN inspection teams, dating to 18 when it found that a few people on the teams were US Special Forces members. In the 10s, Special Forces and CIA officers traveled undercover to various parts of Iraq, mostly in the northern areas dominated by the Kurds, where distrust of US intentions runs deep because of Washingtons unwillingness to remove Hussein in the early part of the decade. In other parts of Iraq, Special Forces members are operating in small teams on a variety of missions. These are taking place in areas populated largely by Shiite Muslims around Basra, in the south, where mistrust of the Baghdad government is rife; in the western desert near the Jordanian border; and even close to Baghdad. They are doing this in parallel with the UN weapons inspectors. These efforts are not going to come as a surprise to the Brits, or the French, or the Russians, or the Chinese. What really matters is whether they are caught doing it publicly, because that would create political problems for the administration. Documentation was provided on anthrax and the VX nerve agent just recently. This should have been disclosed in the documents sent to the U.N. last year (Kole ). Al-Samoud missiles were found and Iraq faced the decision to destroy them. Saddam says the Al-Samoud did not violate the U.N. range restrictions of mile limit (Bush ). The Al-Samoud missiles were being destroyed slowly because they exceed the mile limit (Fox 1). There is recent and fresh evidence that Iraq is planning to use chemical weapons, perhaps against U.S. forces or Iraqi citizens. Some groups believe that the U.S. was using the threat of war to control the oil fields in Iraq. As late as 188, Dow Chemical provided $1.5 million worth of chemical pesticides to Iraq, despite the documented fear that these chemicals would be weaponized. Others feel that no evidence or proof of a weapons program in Iraq had been found ( Kole 1). The American Friends Service Committee does not believe that there is any evidence that Iraq has nuclear weapons. They believe that the American people do not believe this war makes any sense (Conflict 1). Some veterans were saying "no to war in Iraq". They believe that the only real reason for the war would be for us to be attacked and Except for September 11, we have not been attacked (Veterans 1). Some veterans stand behind their country and the President of the U.S. A group calling itself September 11 sent terror threats to the U.S., Australian and British embassies in New Zealand warning it has 55 pounds of cyanide to use against American interests when Iraq is attacked. Due to the war there may be terror attacks on the U.S. and National Security has been raised to protect the U.S. (Meserve 1). Others wonder why we can have weapons of mass destruction but Iraq can't. The President has to go through proper protocol and take steps to use our weapons and Saddam does as he pleases. He has already used them on his own people (Paneth ).
Poll after poll shows a large majority of Americans supported military action against Saddam Hussein. But most were in no hurry, preferring to wait for more weapons inspections, more diplomacy, and more allies standing by the United States. President Bush rallied to win backing for military disarmament of Iraq and to promote better rights for the Iraqi people (Loven ). The military was ready to begin the military action in Iraq when President Bush gave the order. Surveys consistently show the U.S. public wants U.N. approval for war on Iraq, even though in at least one recent poll people expressed little confidence in the United Nations. The U.N. has been criticized for not living up to its responsibilities. Beneath the desire to back President Bush and the belief Saddam is a menace the polls track an undercurrent of concern about the possibility of sending in U.S. troops while other nations are pressing for alternatives. If done right, this campaign against Saddam Hussein could bring forth a fundamental shift in the region toward more democratic governments. This is the best possible way to stamp out extremist factions that spread hate and nurture terrorists.
People are looking to the United Nations for reassurance, not necessarily out of esteem for the world body, but because they find the accusations of Iraqi weapons violations too complicated to sort out for themselves. The U.S. foreign policy is aimed at ensuring freedom, justice, and democracy around the world. I believe our decision on Iraq will affect our future, our children and grandchildren in ways we can not predict. We need to get rid of all weapons of mass destruction. But I wonder if killing people is right. I guess I have mixed emotions on the subject. I believe that Iraq needs to be disarmed or face the consequences. There are so many reasons to be for and to be against the war in Iraq. I read about how people live during a war, afraid to go outside, afraid to do anything. Being afraid of any terrorist's attacks that may come our way. I have supported President Bush's Decision. President Bush is right in saying we need to get rid of weapons of mass destruction. Any kind of chemical or biological weapons need to be destroyed. Now is the time to put aside debates and reflect on the sacrifice of nearly a quarter of a million Americans. When the Twin Towers collapsed in New York, the nation was awed by the willingness of a brave few who put their own lives at risk in service to others. Their efforts helped unearth a deep wellspring of pride in the country. Now is another time for awe, inspired by promising men and women who are putting themselves at risk to minimize our own. If Saddam Hussein had been removed from power and all weapons of mass destruction had been disarmed we would not be at war with Iraq. This nation is at war. Bombs and rockets are falling. Soldiers on both sides are being wounded and killed. In the face of that reality our hearts and minds are torn. We want to believe that the cause is just and that there will be greater freedom and security throughout the world because of this military involvement. Still, we find it hard to believe that the nations of the world cant seem to come up with any effective way to settle these besides the use of violence. People of conscience and good will are divided and separated on these issues. As we go into war we should pray for the men and women fighting for our country and our freedom. Pray for world peace.
Please note that this sample paper on War in Iraq is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on War in Iraq, we are here to assist you. Your essay on War in Iraq will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
