If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy paper at affordable prices!
In the article Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy is about a clash between the boy scouts laws and the beliefs of a boy scout. The conflict is on that all twelve laws must be followed; the one in particular is the one on reverence. This has a created a large controversy.
According to the laws of Boy Scout there are twelve that must be followed trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent. They had a member who had been scouting with them for ten years, his name Darrell Lambert. Last year he had achieved the highest rank which is Eagle. . As he is now in college, he volunteers as an assistant in a troop in Port Orchard, where his own mother is a scoutmaster. The issue here is the ultimatum given to Lambert last month which was handed to him by scouting officials in Seattle. The ultimatum was to "...abide by the vow of reverence by Nov or get out." According to Lambert he looks at it from another perspective, he feels "he was given a week to find God". He finds their request unrealistic he says "they say I should think about what I …Can they expect me to change my beliefs in seven days?" Apparently the boy scouts official, Mark Hunter, (the director of marketing and administration for the chief Seattle Council) they feel they are just "enforcing a national policy". The feel very strongly on this matter as they feel this is the basis, the foundation of the scouts organization "The Boy Scouts is a faith based organization, he said, and the issue of God is not negotiable. Aside from the vow of reverence in the Scout Law, every Boy Scout pledges a duty to God and in the Scout Oath." The feel by Lambert not meeting up to this requirement, he cannot be apart of this organization, since the basis of this organization is based on the faith of God. He even goes to sate in the article "'Advocating a belief in a supreme being has been a core value of the Boy Scouts, Hunter said. 'The 1th point of the Scout Law is 'reverent,' and that includes being faithful in your religious duties and respecting the beliefs of others." As it happens to be, Lamberts acknowledges that he was aware the importance of this "national policy long ago. He admitted to sometimes mouthing the parts about reverence and God when reciting the law and oath. Other times… training for adult leaders." at this training for adult leaders a scouting official began a discussion about religion and mentioned "that the only way a non believer could advance in scouting would be to lie about his beliefs, said Lambert and his mother, Trish Lambert, …The official went on to suggest that 'a person who doesn't believe in God is not a good citizen,' said Lambert". In the article it goes on to explain, it was that comment, which has caused a problem for him. Even though he was an atheist and he revealed it, still many of the leaders and adults considered him as a role model in his troop, and he achieved the status of Eagle. Even when last year when being considered for the Eagle award, when he was interviewed by the board of scouting leaders, even then he notified them that he was an atheist. His mother had told him not to, but he felt he had to, even if it meant him not receiving his award. In fact several members of the board congratulated his mother, saying it was commendable of her son to have the courage. In fact in one of the leaders in his mother's troop, backed up her son once again, when they got sixteen parents, who represented the entire troop, who all signed a letter to the Chief Seattle Council to permit Lambert to stay on. That his "atheism had never been an issue in the troop and it did nothing to change the spiritual foundation of scouting." Even though Mrs. Lambert stated that she did indeed believe in God as the other leaders did, but "… her son should not be punished for 'questioning himself and his spirituality.' ".
After having read the article I feel the reason why the Chief Seattle council won't allow Darrell Lambert to stay are no unjust to him. One of the main reasons being, they mentioned in the article "'Advocating a belief in a supreme being has been a core value of the Boy Scouts,' Hunter said. 'The 1th point of the Scout Law is 'reverent,' and that includes being faithful in your religious duties and respecting the beliefs of others.". After having said that statement, they specifically state respecting the beliefs of others, they do not specify that this rule does not imply to fellow scout members. This being the case and this being their policy, they should not even be trying to kick out Derek Lambert. If they were to, they would somewhat being going against their own beliefs, which would in the end be extremely contradictory t o their argument. Their argument being that Lambert's belief of atheism is different from what the Scouts believe. They say that the basis of the Scout is the belief in God "Scouting is a private organizationold, respected, devoted entirely to service of others. A general belief in God, as the source of right and the Being to whom we owe ultimate allegiance, is woven into its entire fabric" (www.claremount.org, based on a trial). Even though they believe in this, is it really right to let someone else's belief, not to be allowed in this organization, since they do point out they need to respect other's beliefs and atheism is a form of belief. Therefore they should respect it. By not allowing him to stay in the organization, is it not only unfair but also goes against our right to have freedom of religion. Our freedom of religion states a) right to entertain religious beliefs of ones own choosing b) right to declare beliefs openly without fear of reprisal c) right to manifest religious belief by worship, practice, teaching and dissemination.(http//instruct.uwo.ca/philosophy). Parts a and b state a) right to entertain religious beliefs of ones own choosing b) right to declare beliefs openly without fear of reprisal, which basically says we have the right to believe in any belief we want to, its our right. This being the case the Scouts Organization has no justification to take that right away from Darrell Lambert. It's his right given to him, by the constitution which has been established since the year 1788, that was about two hundred and fourteen years ago. These rights were given to all American citizens and residents two hundred and fourteen years ago, and now the Scouts Organization wants to take that right away from Darrell Lambert, due to the fact that he has his own set of beliefs, which is incidentally his right to being able to do so? If they are able to do this, then that means what was written two hundred and fourteen years ago, means nothing. That the basis of our government, (which what the constitution is) can be considered worthless and pointless. Since that is not the case, they do not have the right to kick him out of the Scouts organization; just because he chose to exercise his right does not mean he should be condemed for it. After all it seems the Boy Scouts organization not only has a problem with atheist but also with homosexuals, which is also a right, a right to having your own sexual preference. If they continue to have problems with people's personal preferences, it makes one wonder what next? People who are living together out of wed lock? Or children who are conceived out of wedlock? In fact, unless ones personal life does not affect the organization, they should not be terminated
Overall, if the Scouts organization does kick him out of the organization, may people will be very disappointed and upset. We already know this because one troop has already shown their disagreement, with the Scouts organization on this matter, and there is more to come, if they continue. In fact someone's religious beliefs have nothing to do with what kind of person they are, unless they try to subjugate and impose others with their beliefs. After all the point of Boy Scouts is to help others and do good for people, despite their beliefs, perhaps they should consider applying that policy to themselves first.
Custom writing service can write essays on article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy
Please note that this sample paper on article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy, we are here to assist you. Your essay on article analysis of: Scout not prepared for group's ultimatum: Getright with God by Dean E. Murphy will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
